So the first chapter in the Drunk Literature Book Club Experiment is coming to an end. Everyone who participated that has something to say about the book, remember to post by 11:59 PM, tomorrow. (Oh, and send me links!)
I read The Imperfectionists during a whirlwind week when I was mad on top of my reading. Books were like potato chips, and I was a huge Lay’s addict. That has since calmed down, as work has pretty much gotten in the way of , oh, my entire life. In a (mostly) good way, though. I am completely passionate about my job. The only thing I’m struggling with at the moment is the way in which it interferes with my friendship-upkeep. I’m trying to learn to be a bit more balanced in that respect.
Anyway, back to The Imperfectionists:
To me, it’s a stunningly poignant first novel, one only a journalist can write. The careful meditation on character study takes on the sort of profiling traditional of newspapers. I loved the way no one was grossly interconnected (in that, there’s not that cheesy progression from one story to the next), and I LOVED how the “history” of the newspaper was inserted between stories.
The stories that stick out in my mind are the women. Hardy, Abbey, Kathleen (even Ruby and Ornella to a degree). And Arthur’s– for more tragic reasons. But the women all seemed to have a similar vein in their parts: relationships. Specifically, how women who have made work their life handle issues of intimacy and companionship. At first, I took some offense to this. These women, though strong professionally, seemed to be completely ruled by the men in their lives. It’s all they ever thought about. But then I looked at the book a bit more closely. In essence, ALL of the stories dealt with relationships, NOT strictly those of the women. Because that’s what happens when you’re overworked and underpaid. You become a total freak and those things that give any semblance of a break from your harried life at your harried job become so monumental to your outward existence. All you have left are the f*cked up strings we call relationships. It’s not the happiest take on these character’s lives, but it’s not all unhappy either. Hardy settles for that joke of a boyfriend due to lack of self-esteem, and the subconscious need to deal with something completely out of control gives her a break from the stress of her job. Abbey’s encounter on the airplane exposes all the ways in which she– a typically logical and practical mind– deals with the fact that her job makes people expendable. Kathleen is high-powered and at the top of her game, but ther’es always that nagging question of “what if.” Specifically, what if she had given all her career motivations up for love.
Rachman’s novel is truly a remarkable expose on just how all our crazy idiosyncrasies evolve through time and experience. It is a petri dish of a novel, cultivating a breed of human beings that are as fascinating as they are ordinary. I honestly cannot wait to see exactly what he comes up with next.
Also, a note on the drinking while reading this book. Since my most common choice has been, most notably, water; one evening (or was it afternoon) my wonderful roommate and I decided to spice things up a bit and come up with a concoction. Hence, pineapple margaritas. All parts fabulous and refreshing. Probably nothing any self-respecting journalist would drink, but then again I”m plumb out of rye and bitters.
Excited to hear everyone else’s take on the novel!





I agree, relationships were definitely key to this novel and I think you’re right to connect that to how consuming work was in their lives. I also really connected with Arthur’s story, even though it was awfully tragic. Thanks for hosting this, it’s been a lot of fun!
Becca is this the appropriate place to post comments for the book club? Who knows. What i do know is I really liked this book. In my real-world (vs. virtual) book club we are reading Love in the Time of Cholera, but I stuck it on the shelf last Sunday and spent a long, leisurely afternoon outside with the Imperfectionists instead (kinda felt like I was cheating on my regular book club, maybe that made me enjoy this book even more!).
Novels that read like short stories, especially ones that reveal links between characters and plotlines that intersect as you progress, have always been one of my favorite kinds of reading. The most intriguing chapter to me was the one featuring Ornella. I just thought the whole idea of someone reading the newspapers in the way you’d read a novel, falling behind and living in fear of “spoilers” until she finally gets past the mental block of the trauma of 4/23/94 to devour years’ worth of headlines and events at once to come back to reality….where was i going with this run-on sentence….oh yeah — I thought it was fascinating.
I also enjoyed the way the founding of the paper and its rise and fall, along with the generations of the Otts, was interesting but I didn’t love the way it was just tucked into the end of every chapter. I don’t know if that bothered anyone else? I also found the story of the original Ott incredibly sad, with his unrequited love and solitary death, and the pitifulness of Oliver Ott and his helplessness when it came to the paper made for kind of a dis-satisfying ending. Maybe because I developed such a fondness for the cast of characters as I read about their lives chapter by chapter, it seemed sad for things to just go out with a whimper. But, such is life I guess.
Overall, though, it was great — I couldn’t put it down until I was finished! Now, fun’s over…back to Marquez…..
Pingback: Happy New Year! « Drunk Literature